

This blog documents progress on the Too Smart City art project, intended for the 2009 Situated Technologies Exhibit in NYC.
The concern I have with this approach is that it appears to provide feedback on whether metal is proximate. It definitely does not provide precise measurements for the amount of metal detected. Therefore I think i need to get a profesional metal detector that can provide more information on what amount and perhaps type of metal is nearby. This brings us into the realm of those treasure seekers. There is a large group of treasure hunting enthusiasts who use these devices to find lost jewelry and ancient coins. Their high end devices can pin point distance from the surface, distinguish metal from minerals in rocks, and provide on board diagnostics. Not exactly what I need. There are other metal detector systems as well, for instance metal detectors are used poultry farms to make sure there aren't any metal bits in the birds. Also, metal detectors are used by various security sensors at night clubs and airports.

In this version there would be a series of 8 sensors that are embedded in the mid-section of the body.Each sensor would tell user distance, and the sensor ID would be used to determine which direction the user was in.
Key problem with this is that it is overkill if we are using sonar sensors. Sonar sensors read with a beam, where the sensor area is first thin, then grows in width to the extension of its range.
The concern with this system is that if there are two users standing equidistant from the pole in two of the locations (as depicted by the orange dots in 5 and 7) it would be the same as if a single user were standing in zone 6.
This picture roughly depicts the idea - where it can determine different distances at different times. This would then need some algorithm to analyze fluxtuations in distance over time.